By in Lifestyle, Nutrition

While some of the information I have found does not necessarily directly pertain to Canada, you have to admit that most issues Americans experience with their FDA end up showing up on our front doorstep. You know what they say rolls down hill, don’t you?

For those of you who’s minds when into the gutter I’ll spell it out – CANS

FDA officials announced last Friday the 15th of January that they had reversed their position that bisphenol A is safe. The chemical, used to line most food and beverage cans, has been found in the urine of 93% of Americans tested.

The agency now considers BPA to be of some concern for effects on the brain, behavior and prostate glands of fetuses and the very young. Scientific studies have raised concerns about the chemical’s link to breast and prostate cancer, diabetes, obesity, heart disease, reproductive failures and behavioral problems.

But because BPA was classified years ago as an indirect food additive, it is not subject to the kind of scrutiny that other chemicals are. Without critical data about BPA, it is impossible to regulate the chemical, officials said.

BPA, first manufactured in 1891, was later developed as a plasticizer in the early 1960s. It was classified in 1963 as an indirect food additive and is listed among some 3,000 chemicals that are “generally regarded as safe.” That designation exempts them from scrutiny.

According to the FDA’s regulations, a substance that is granted that status is not subject to FDA review.

So, while the agency can broadcast its opinion that the chemical is not safe, it can’t compel companies to provide certain information about the chemical.

Their hands are tied! But just who tied them? Who is responsible for giving the GRAS classification to BPA? From the same Journal Sentinel article:

The Journal Sentinel obtained e-mails through the Freedom of Information Act that showed how the agency’s look at BPA had been influenced by BPA makers.

The newspaper found that industry scientists wrote sections of the FDA’s earlier draft declaring the chemical to be safe for all uses. It later obtained e-mails that showed industry lobbyists were given priority treatment in scrutinizing studies and that FDA regulators looked to them for advice on how to deal with the media.

The newspaper also uncovered documents that showed how BPA makers borrowed the same tactics and some of the same people as the tobacco industry to downplay the health risks of their products. In a meeting held in Washington, D.C., last May, food packaging executives mapped out a public relations strategy that included finding a pregnant woman to serve as a spokeswoman for the benefits of BPA. Notes referred to such a person as “the holy grail.”

The BPA makers lobby the FDA to get their chemical classified in the “Generally Recognized As Safe” category, and now, decades later, when the FDA is presented with enough evidence to question that classification, they claim their hands are tied to do anything about it!

So, dear readers, it looks like the future of BPA is in your hands. You can join others in the fight to pass legislation banning BPA. According to the Journal Sentinel, “Minnesota, Connecticut, the City of Chicago and two counties in New York have banned BPA in baby bottles. Other measures are being considered in 30 states and municipalities. A federal ban on BPA in all food contact has been proposed in Congress.”

And, you can use your voice as a consumer and choose to avoid BPA.

How to avoid BPA exposure:

Because of the ubiquitous presence of BPA in the linings of canned foods, you should limit your consumption of industrialized canned goods (particularly if you’re pregnant or nursing).

Avoid polycarbonate plastics, particularly those labeled as plastic #7 and #3. Don’t eat or drink out of these containers; don’t store foods in these containers; and don’t heat foods in these containers. As an alternative, use glass, stainless steel, or ceramic containers NOT lined with plastics.

It has been pointed out that when having someones pipes were worked on earlier in the year, they discovered they were all #3 PVC plastic. So, maybe we should also add avoiding tap water to the list of suggested changes…..



Tags: , , , , , ,
  1. Reply

    Better be the head of a dog than the tail of a lion. ....................................................

    • John
    • January 29, 2010

    Aside from the dangers of ingesting BPA, most soft drinks and energy drinks contain HFCS (high fructose corn syrup).

    In 1966, refined sugar, known as sucrose, was the most commonly used sweetener, accounting for 86 percent of all sweeteners. Currently, sweeteners made from corn are most common, accounting for 55 percent of sweeteners on the market and bringing in $4.5 billion in annual sales. The rise in corn sweeteners stems largely from the steady growth of high-fructose corn syrup, which increased from zero consumption in 1966 to 62.6 pounds per person in 2001.

    Among the leading products containing high-fructose corn syrup are soft drinks and fruit beverages, although cookies, gum, jams, jellies and baked goods also contain the syrup.

    for more info go to:

  2. Reply

    Thanks for your input John!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stock Your Vegan Kitchen Like a Pro


Download free eBook